Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39177 (RAJ)

MAMTA KUMARI GURJAR W/O SUNIL SIRADHANA, D/O MAHADEV PRASAD GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17613/2025 · 2025-11-18

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46252] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17613/2025 Mamta Kumari Gurjar W/o Sunil Siradhana, D/o Mahadev Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Near Govt. Hospital, Vpo Babai, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Department Of Personnel (Dop), Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Director (Administration), Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution (Shifu), Jhalana Doongri, Jln Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subhash Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been preferred with following prayer; I) The respondents may kindly be directed to issue waiting list for the post of Pharmacist pursuant to advertisement dated 05.05.2023 and if the petitioner who is standing first in waiting list with marks of 39.20% is otherwise deserved to be allowed her appointment on the post of Pharmacist under MBC female category with all consequential service benefits. ii) The respondents may further be directed to fix the time limit for final disposal of hold candidates so that the replacement can be taken from the waiting list. [2025:RJ-JP:46252] (2 of 2) [CW-17613/2025] 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /37