Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39172 (JHR)

AJAY KUMAR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7076/2025 · 2025-12-12

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:37358 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7076 of 2025 Ajay Kumar Sharma, aged about 29 years, son of Rajendra Sharma, resident of Village-Charki Pahari, P.O. and P.S. Jainagar, District-Koderma ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Ashok Kr. Sinha, Advocate Ms. Kumari Priyambada, Advocate Mr. Anshuman Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P. 04/ 12.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 119 of 2025, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(2), 324(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Koderma. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land of the petitioner was acquired and compensation was not made and in view of that petitioner was agitating for that false case has been registered against the petitioner on the instigation of MLA, Barhi. He further submits that there are another three cases being Jainagar P.S. Case No. 119/2025, 120/2025 and 123/2025. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He then submits that it is not believable that petitioner will do same act continuously for that four cases have been lodged against the petitioner. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations of extortion and assault are there. 5. In para 23 of the petition it has been disclosed for the same ( 2025:JHHC:37358 ) type of allegation another three cases have been lodged being Jainagar P.S. Case No. 119/2025, 120/2025 and 123/2025 on the instigation of MLA, Barhi and it has been pointed out that land of the petitioner was acquired and compensation was not made for that petitioner was agitating. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Koderma, in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 119 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.12.12.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-