JUGNU ALIAS JOGENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/6678/2025 · 2025-04-16
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39171 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39171 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:57112-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6678 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jugnu Alias Jogendra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faizan Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- Amit Kumar Tripathi,G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A.
2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned notice dated 28.11.2024 issued by the respondent no.2 in Case No.93/2024 under Section 3(1) of U.P. Control of Gundas Act 1970, Police Station Surajpur, District Gautam Budh Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner apprised to the Court that the petitioner has already submitted objection/reply to the impugned notice dated 28.11.2024.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose off this writ petition with the direction that in case any such objection is already filed, the authority concerned shall decide the objections in accordance with law by a speaking and reasoned
order expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of submission of a copy of this order along with copy of the reply, after affording opportunity to the petitioner. Needless to say that in case the petitioner is further aggrieved by the decision of the Competent Authority, he can always assail the validity of the same before the Revisional Authority in accordance with law. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.)
Order Date :- 17.4.2025 A. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad