JAI SINGH SHEKHAWAT S/O LATE SH. VIKRAM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/13594/2025 · 2025-11-20
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39170 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39170 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46912] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13594/2025 Jai Singh Shekhawat S/o Late Sh. Vikram Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o G-46/49, Police Line Lohakhan, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Inspector General Of Police (Headquarters), Rajasthan, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.
3. Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer Range, Ajmer (Raj.)
4. Superintendent Of Police, Ajmer (Raj.)
5. Smt. Meenu D/o Man Singh Rathore, R/o Behind Lane Of Choki Ke Balaji Mandir, Hindoli, District Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dikshant Jain for Mr. Anurag Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Ms. Sunita Meena, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 20/11/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred with following prayer:- i) Direct the respondents to consider and decide the application dated 14.06.2025 submitted by the petitioner for compassionate appointment in accordance with law, within a stipulated time frame ii) Direct the respondents not to proceed with the appointment of Smt. Meenu, wife of the deceased, on compassionate grounds.
2. Issue notice to respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
[2025:RJ-JP:46912] (2 of 2) [CW-13594/2025]
3. Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.4.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this order to learned counsel for respondents.
5. Office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondents.
6. During course of arguments, it has been suggested that if petitioner moves a representation before the respondents- Authority then they will consider in accordance with prevalent rules and the procedure.
7. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of judgment referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /10