- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43069 WP No. 33538 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 33538 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: MS. JAYAMANI D/O LATE LAXMANA DAS, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT: DOOR NO.19-10-772, SHEENA COMPOUND, OPPOSITE GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, PANDESHWARA, MANGALORE-575001 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AJAY PRABHU M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER THE MANGALORE CITY CORPORATION, LALBAGH, M.G. ROAD, MANGALORE-575003 2. THE COMMISSIONER THE MANGALORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KULUR FERRY ROAD, URWA, MANGALURU-575006 3. MRS. SANGEETHA KIRAN BOLAR MAJOR, W/O MR. KIRAN BOLAR, R/AT "SWASTHIK", MALLI COMPOUND, BEHIND PADAVU SCHOOL, NANTHOOR, KULSHEKARA, MANGALORE, D.K.-575005 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.V. NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43069 WP No. 33538 of 2024 SRI. T. HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2; SRI. N.C.SRINIVASA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ENDORSEMENT IN E2/CR/2024-25(191183) DATED 04.10.2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND THE ENDORSEMENT IN MANAPRA:NAYOSA:ETHARE:134:2024-25 DATED 21.10.2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER After arguing the petition for some time, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and sought liberty to file appropriate representation before the respondent No.1 against the unauthorized construction put up by respondent No.3. He prays that respondent No.1 be directed to consider the representation. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the respondent No.1 with any grievance regarding the construction put up by respondent No.3. If the construction - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43069 WP No. 33538 of 2024 put up by the respondent No.3 is not in accordance with the sanctioned plan, respondent No.1 may take appropriate action in accordance with law within a month from the date of the petitioner submitting the representation. The pending I.A. No.1/2025 stands disposed of. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7