Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39169 (KAR)

M/S. MAARSS MOVIES AND MUSIC v. SRI HAMASALEKHA

CRP/830/2025 · 2025-11-14

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46650 CRP No. 830 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 830 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: M/S. MAARSS MOVIES AND MUSIC, (A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM), HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 53 /A, TILOK, GROUND FLOOR, KHADHI COMMISSION, HBCS, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, KATTARIGUPPE MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 085, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR. BHARATH KUMAR JAIN, S/O LATE HIRACHAND JAIN, AGED 44 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. TARUNN SURANA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI HAMASALEKHA, S/O GOVIND RAJU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1092/93, 10TH C CROSS, 11TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BENGALURU – 560 086. REPRESENTED BY ITS POA HOLDER, MR. TEJASWINI N, D/O NAGARAJ R, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court Of Karnatka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46650 CRP No. 830 of 2025 RESIDING AT G.R. SHARADA NILAYA, NO.749, 4TH B MAIN, 2ND CROSS, ASHRAMA ROAD, LAGGERE, BENGALURU – 560 058. 2. AIRTEL DIGITAL LIMITED, BRAND OWNER OF “WYNK MUSIC”, BHARTI CRESCENT, 1, NELSON MANDELA ROAD, VASANTH KUNJ PHASE – II, NEW DELHI – 110 070, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. 3. SAAVN MEDIA PVT.LTD, BRAND OWNER OF “JIOSAAVN” A WING, 19TH FLOOR, ONE BKC, G BLOCK, BKC BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI-400 051, REPRESENTATION BY ITS DIRECTOR. 4. HUNGAMA DIGITAL MEDIA, ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED, POSTAL:SF-B-07, ART GUILT HOUSE, PHOENIX MARKET CITY, LBS MARG, KURLA (W), MUMBAI-400 070, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. 5. GAMMA GAANA LIMITED, EXPRESS BUILDING, 9-10, BAHADURSHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI DL-110 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 1.03.2025 PASSED ON IA NO.X IN OS NO.4967/2021 ON THE FILE OF XVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE., REJECTING THE IA NO.X FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 10 OF CPC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46650 CRP No. 830 of 2025 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Office has raised objections regarding maintainability of the present petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner filed memo. 3. Memo reads as under:- “The Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed with liberty to file appropriate petition challenging the impugned order." 4. Placing the memo on record, this present petition is dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11