APHC010832092018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 40010/2018 Between: 1. PONUGUBATI NAGENDRUDU,, S/O CHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC - UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. GUNDLAPALLI VILLAGE, NAKREKALLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. PONUGUBATI RATHAIAH,, S/O GURAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC - UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. GUNDLAPALLI VILLAGE, NAKREKALLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. BADDETI LAKSHMINARAYANA,, S/O LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. GUNDLAPALLI VILLAGE, NAKREKALLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND COMMANDANT AREA DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION AND COMMANDANT AREA DEVELOPMENT, NAGARJUNA SAGAR PROJECT, CAMP OFFICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, NSJC AND M CIRCLE, LINGAMGUNTLA, NARASARAOPETA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.40010 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not recruiting the petitioners as NMRs on regular basis in the 3rd respondent office is illegal arbitrary and contrary to the fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for recruitment as NMRs on regular basis in the office of the 3rd respondent or in any other office with all consequential benefits thereon, and pass…” 2. No representation on either side, though the matter is posted under the caption “for Dismissal”. There was no representation on either side on the previous adjournment also. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 05.08.2025 Pmk 4 26 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:40010 OF 2018 Date: 05.08.2025 Pmk