Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39166 (CHH)

RAMBHARAT AGARIYA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4567/2022 · 2025-05-07

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:21380 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4567 of 2022 1 - Rambharat Agariya S/o Shri Harawan Agariya Aged About 59 Years R/o Village - Pipalpara House No. 110, Korwa Para Village Deviganj, Post Aragahi, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Naresh Agariya S/o Shri Harawan Agariya Aged About 56 Years R/o Village - Pipalpara Devgai, Sarguja, District - Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Suresh Agariya S/o Shri Harawan Agariya Aged About 49 Years R/o Village - Pipalpara, Devgai, Sarguja, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhatisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Commissioner Mahatma Gandhi Narega Vikas Bhawan, 3rd Floor, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Revenue Divisional Commissioner Sarguja Division Ramanujganj, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector Office Of The Collectorate Balrampur Ramanujganj, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.05.12 12:27:09 +0530 2 5 - The Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Balrampur Ramanujganj, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ramanujganj, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh 7 - The Tahsildar Tahsil Ramanujganj, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Shri Navneet Yadav, Advocate For State : Shri Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 08/05/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh