1 2025:CGHC:48295 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8118 of 2023 Naresh Kumar Sankat S/o Shri Parmanand Sankat Aged About 56 Years Presently Working As Assistant Superintendent, Office Of Regional Transport Authority, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Transport Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Transport Commissioner Indrawati Bhawan C Block, 3rd Floor, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Regional Transport Authority Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) --- Respondent For Petitioners : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Mr. Ajay Pandey, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 19.09.2025 1. By way of this petition, the Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- “10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased set-aside the order dated 5.10.2023 (Annexure P/1) and further direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to continue his services at the present place of posting i.e. Office of Regional Transport Authority, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief as it may deems fit and appropriate. Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL Date: 2025.09.19 18:02:40 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an order of attachment has been passed which was banned, and as such this Court has passed an order of stay dated 10.10.2023 and on the verge of the stay order, the petitioner is continuing on his present place of posting. Learned counsel further submits that in an identical matter, the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in WPS No. 4122/2023 set aside the attachment order reserving the liberty to the respondents to take appropriate steps on the administrative side in accordance with law, therefore, this petition may also be disposed of in terms of the order dated 05.07.2023 passed in WPS No. 4122/2023 (Annexure P/6). 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents/State does not dispute the proposition made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and order dated 05.07.2023 passed in WPS No. 4122/2023 (Annexure P/6), the impugned order dated 05.10.2023 (Annexure P/1) is set aside reserving the liberty in favour of the respondents to take appropriate steps on the administrative side in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE AMIT PATEL