Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39157 (RAJ)

GAURAV SHARMA S/O ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14958/2025 · 2025-10-14

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42031] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14958/2025 Gaurav Sharma S/o Ashok Kumar Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kherapati Mohalla, Chaumukha Mahadev, Street Near Hardev Ji, Temple Bharatpur, Rajasthan-321001 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj). 302005 2. Director Non-Gazetted, Medical And Health Services, Swathya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302007 3. Mission Director, National Health Mission, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj). 4. Director The State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare Rajasthan, Jhalana Institutional Area, Near Doordarshan, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/10/2025 1. The writ petition is filed with following prayer: “(i) That the respondents may be directed to grant the bonus marks, as mentioned in the aforesaid advt. 05.05.2023 and Guideline dated 25.04.2023, to the petitioner for working as Nursing Tutor. (ii) To direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner for aforesaid recruitment by considering the experience of Nursing Tutor as valid experience and awarding bonus marks for this experience.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring judgment dated 12.03.2025 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.63/2022 [2025:RJ-JP:42031] (2 of 2) [CW-14958/2025] titled as State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Savita Manmiya passed by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur submits that the controversy raised herein is no more re-integra and same is already decided by Hon’ble Single Judge (SB CWP NO.2835/2020) and affirmed by Hon’ble Division Bench. 3. Learned counsel for respondent submits that considering referred judgments, the department will consider the representation, if filed to them. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /32