Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39157 (MAD)

R.NAGARAJ v. The District Revenue officer

WA/1718/2025 · 2025-06-12

J Nisha Banu, M Jothiraman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.ANo.1718 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.A.No.1718 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.13026 of 2025 R.Nagaraj, S/o Raman ... Appellant Vs. 1. The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Campus, Tiruppur - 641 604 2. The Sub-Collector/Authorized Officer (Land Reforms), Collectorate Campus, Tiruppur - 641 604 3. Mary land Housing Promoters, No.5, Sakthi Cross Cut Road No.2, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore Town, coimbatore - 641 012. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent against the order passed in W.P.No.37287 of 2024 dated 12.12.2024 For Appellant : Mr.S.Lakshminarayanan For Respondents : Mr.R.Kumaravel,Addl.G.P. for R1 & R2 J U D G M E N T https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.ANo.1718 of 2025 (The Judgment of the Court was delivered by J.Nisha Banu,J.) This Appeal has been filed as against the order dated 12.12.2024. passed in W.P.No.37287 of 2024, in and by which, this Court has dismissed the said writ petition stating that the petitioner is not an aggrieved party and that the petitioner has not challenge the order dated 22.08.2022 of the District Revenue Officer. 2. The writ petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct re-investigation into the land of Maryland Housing Promoters as directed by the District Revenue Officer vide order dated 05.10.2023. In the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.32787/2024 dated 12.12.2024 at paragraph No.4, this Court has held as follows: 4. On perusal of the said order dated 05.10.2023 in N.M.15482/2023/J2, it would only say that a fresh enquiry has to be held (Fwpj;j kPs tprhuiz)/ The order of the DRO reads as follows:- ,e;neh;tpy;. gj;jp 2y; Fwpg;gplg;gl;Ls;s khtl;l tUtha; mYtyh; (ePyh; jPh;g;ghak;) cj;jutpy;. <nuhL epyrPh;jpUj;j cjtp Mizaiu kPs tprhuiz nkw;bfhz;L cj;jut[ gpwg;gpf;f bjhptpf;fg;gl;Ls;s epiyapy;. jp-th nkhpyz;l; cwtprp'; gpunkhl;lh; epWtdj;jpdhpd; ;ifg;gw;wpy; cs;s epyk; (Fwpj;j kPs tprhuiz) nkw;bfhz;L chpa tpjpKiwfspd;go cj;jutpl murhiz (epiy) vz; 34 tUtha;j;Jiw ehs; 14/10/2015?d;go mjpfhuk; https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.ANo.1718 of 2025 bgw;w mYtyh; (epyrPh;jpUj;jk;)- rhh; Ml;rpaUf;f ,jd; K:yk; cj;jutplg;gLfpwJ/; 5. The phrase kPs/// is sought to be taken advantage by the petitioner to demand a reinvestigation on the properties held by the petitioner which was neither intended nor the order of the first respondent indicate such an investigation. That apart, the petitioner is not an aggrieved party in as much as the petitioner has not challenged the order dated 22.08.2002 of the District Revenue Officer. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 3. As rightly pointed out by the writ Court, the appellant is not an aggrieved party and he has also not challenged the order dated 22.08.2002 of the Disrict Revenue Officer. 4. In view of the above, we find no merits in this writ appeal. Therefore, we are not inclined to to interfere with the order passed by this Court in the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [J.N.B.,J.] [M.J.R.,J.] 12.06.2025 vsi Index:Yes/No J.NISHA BANU,J. AND M.JOTHIRAMAN,J. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.ANo.1718 of 2025 vsi To 1. The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Campus, Tiruppur - 641 604 2. The Sub-Collector/Authorized Officer (Land Reforms), Collectorate Campus, Tiruppur - 641 604 W.A..No.1718 of 2025 12.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis