MD ASHRAF ALI ALIAS RAJU JHADI ALIAS JHADI BABA ALLIAS ASHRAF v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/1526/2025 · 2025-12-15
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39157 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39157 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:37602-DB 1 Cr. A. (DB) No.1526 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. A. (DB) No. 1526 of 2025
-------- Md Ashraf Ali @ Raju Jhadi @ Jhadi Baba @ Ashraf, aged about 41 years, son of Late Md. Salauddin, Resident of H. No. 115A, Railway Line Rahmatganj, Panderpala, P.O. B. Polytechnic Bishunpur, P.S. Bankmore (Bhuli O.P.), Dist. Dhanbad, Jharkhand
... ... Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
…… Respondent
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-------- For the Appellant : Mr. Suraj Singh, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, APP
--------
Order No. 02/ Dated: 15th December, 2025
Heard Mr. Suraj Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 14.11.2025 passed in B.P. No.884 of 2025, arising out of Bank More P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025, by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-XI, Dhanbad whereby and where under the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
3. It has been alleged that the informant had earlier lodged a case against the appellant and others who went to Jail in connection with the said case and out of fear the informant had compromised the matter. It has further been alleged that on 22.07.2025, an explosion had taken place in the parking lot of the house of the informant and it was co- accused Natu Kuraishi who was seen hurling the bomb.
4. Submission has been advanced by learned counsel for the appellant that the hurling of bomb has been attributed to Natu Kuraishi. It has been submitted that the appellant has been implicated only on account of the earlier case in which the appellant had gone to Jail and the
2025:JHHC:37602-DB 2 Cr. A. (DB) No.1526 of 2025 matter was subsequently compromised. Learned counsel adds that the appellant is in custody since 24.07.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant.
6. Regard being had to the fact that the main allegation of hurling bomb has been attributed to Natu Kuraishi, we while setting aside the
order dated 14.11.2025 passed in B.P. No.884 of 2025, arising out of Bank More P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025, by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-XI, Dhanbad, direct the appellant to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad.
7. Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed and disposed of.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
15.12.2025 Basant/Arpit Uploaded on 18.12.2025