[2025:RJ-JP:49909] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7648/2025 M/s Cosetra Merchants Private Limited, C-5, Krishna Balram, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Through Director Shri Ras Bihari Roongta S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Roongta, Aged About 46 Years, R/o C-5, Krishna Balram, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. M/s S.s. Diam Pvt. Ltd., 38, Uniara Garden, Nehru Park, Jaipur Through Director Shri Nitesh Agarwal S/o Shankar Lal Sarraf. 2. Shri Nitesh Agarwal S/o Shankar Lal Sarraf, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 38, Uniara Garden, Nehru Park, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ravindra Kumar Paliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/12/2025 1. The present criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this Petition and the learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Case) No.6, Jaipur Metropolitan-II may kindly be direct to decide the case no.938/2017 (882/2015) titled as M/S Cosetra merchant PVT. LTD. Versus M/S S.S. Diam PVT. LTD. as early as possible or within a period of 6 months. Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deem just and proper looking to the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” [2025:RJ-JP:49909] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7648/2025] 2. By way of filing the present criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Special Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Case) No.6, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, for early disposal of the case No.938/2017 (882/2015) within a period of six months. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, such direction cannot be issued by this Court as per the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of A.R. Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak and Anr. reported in 1992(1) SCC 225 and in the case of P. Rama Chandra Rao. Vs. State of Karnataka reported in 2022 (4) SCC 578. But looking to the fact that the said trial is pending before the Court below since 2017, it is expected from the Court below to make all possible endeavours to conclude the trial expeditiously as early as possible. 4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /95