POLISETTI SRINIVASA, TAMILNADU., v. STATE OF AP., REP. PP AND ANR.,
CRLRC/1650/2014 · 2025-09-17
T Mallikarjuna Rao
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39155 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39155 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010826912014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1650 OF 2014 Between:
1. POLISETTI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. LAKSHMANA RAO, 45 YEARS, R/O.YEDLAKUDI, KOTTARI NAGAR COIL, TAMIL NADU. ...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD. 2. SRI MASTA RAMANNA S/O SATTIYYA @ SATYANARAYANA, AGED 46 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. ANGARA VILLAGE, E.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENTS: Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 07-08-2014 in Crl.M.P.No.433 of 2014 in Crl.A.No. 223 of 2014 on the file of the Special Judge for Trial cases under SCs and STs (POA) Act -cum- X Additional District and Sessions Judge, E.G. at Rajahmundry. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 2705 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order in Crl.M.P.No. 433 of 2014 in Criminal Appeal No. 223 of 2014 dated 7-11-2014 on the file of the Special Judge for trail of cases under SCs & STs (POA) Act cum 10th Additional District and Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry against the Judgment it C.199/2005 dated 25-7-
2
2014 on the file of the Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate at Alamuru by enlarging the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above Crl.Rc in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SRI K. SANDEEP, ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. 2. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO The Court made the following:
O R D E R
1.
This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the Order dated 07.08.2014 passed in Crl.M.P.No.433 of 2014 in Crl.A.No.223 of 2014 on the file of learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SCs and STs (POA) Act-cum-X Additional District and Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry (for short, ‘the trial Court’), wherein a petition filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C seeking to suspend the sentence of imprisonment and fine and the petition is partly allowed. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/accused and Sri K. Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, appearing for the 1st Respondent/State. 3. The present Criminal Revision is filed questioning the orders passed in Crl.M.P.No.433 of 2014 in Crl.A.No.223 of 2014. The said Crl.M.P.No.433 of 2014 is filed seeking to suspend the sentence of imprisonment and fine. 4. A perusal of the e-Courts case status in Crl.A.No.223 of 2014 shows that the case was disposed of as settled before Lok Adalat on 15.12.2015. In view of the disposal of the main Crl.A.No.223 of 2014 before Lok Adalat, this Court views that the cause for the revision does not survive for adjudication. 3
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as cause does not survive for adjudication. Interim orders granted earlier shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date: 18.09.2025. MS
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1650 of 2014 Date: 18.09.2025 MS