Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39146 (AP)

M/s.Leo Granex, a Proprietary Concern, v. Surapaneni Latha,

AS/1032/2016 · 2025-08-20

V Srinivas

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010834682016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT NO: 1032 OF 2016 Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.11.2014 passed in O.S.No.7 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Srikakulam. Between: 1. M/s. Leo Granex, a Proprietary Concern, Rep. by its Propretrix Surapuneni Rani, W/o. Vidyasagar, Hindu, Aged about 54 years. Business, R/o.D.No.81-41, 14th main, 15th Cross, JHBC Society, Padmanabhanagar, Bangalore-70, Karnataka State. 2. Surapuneni Vidyasagar, S/o. late Doraswamy Naidu, Hindu, Aged about 57 years. Business, R/o.D.No.81-41, 14th main, 15th Cross, JHBC Society, Padmanabhanagar, Bangalore-70, Karnataka State. ...Appellants/Defendants AND 1. Surapaneni Latha, W/o.Lakshmi Prasad, Hindu, Aged about 59 years. Business, R/o.Flat Nos.201 & 202, Silverleaf Apartments, Kirtampudi Layout, Visakhapatnam. 2. Sri Koduru Metals and Minerals, a registered Partnership Firm, rep. by its Managing Partner Koduri Satya Venkata Krishna Ravi Prasad, S/o. § Ranga Rao, Hindu, aged about 52 years, D.No.3-746/2, NH-5, w H%ikumpet, Rajahmundry. ...Respondents/Plaintiffs Counsel for the Appellants: Sri A Radhakrishna Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Vimal Varma Vasi Reddy The Court made the following Judgment: i THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS APPEALSUIT No.1032 of 2016 JUDGMENT: Today, when the matter is taken up, Sri A. Radha Krishna, learned counsel for the appellants, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal and the same was endorsed on the E.B. 2. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER . The Principal District Judge, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District (with records) 2. One CC to Sri. A Radhakrishna, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. Vimal Varma Vasi Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 5. Two CD Copies To, 1 Stu sree HIGH COURT DATED:21/08/2025 JUDGMENT AS NO. 1032 OF 2016 sT I S SEP 2025 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS