Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39142 (PAT)

Badhan Yadav @ Bihari Yadav @ Badhan @ Badhan Jee v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./29254/2025 · 2025-05-19

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29254 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2015 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== Badhan Yadav @ Bihari Yadav @ Badhan @ Badhan Jee S/o Late Jogi Yadav R/o Vill.- Nawada, P.S.- Roshanganj, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 19-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satyendra Prasad, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 427, 353, 435, 283, 120(b), 121 & 129(A) of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’), Section 27 of the Arms Act, Section 3 of Damage to Public Property Act and Section 10 & 13 of the U.A.P. Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner belongs to maoist group and on the date of occurrence, he along with others were making firing over police. It is alleged that all the maoist persons were naming each other. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2024. It has also been Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29254 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/2 submitted by the learned counsel that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by the learned Co-ordinate Bench vide Cr.Misc. Case No. 20865 of 2021. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. 5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with a condition that the bailors will be local persons and the petitioner shall fully co- operate in the trial. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 88 of 2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya. Durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T