1 2025:CGHC:46428 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9461 of 2025 1 - Smt Rambati Patel W/o Late Shri Rodan Singh Patel Aged About 55 Years R/o Sant Vinobanagar Ward No. 34, Chhatamuda Bypass, Jutemill, Raigarh, District - Raigarh, Civil And Revenue District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralay, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Urban Administration And Development, 4th Floor, D-Block, Indrawati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Municipal Corporation Through The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 and 2 : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.3/Corporation Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, J. Order on Board 11-09-2025 1. The petitioner’s grievances is that the husband of the petitioner was employee of the Corporation and earlier he was employee of CIDC and he claimed grant of pension, therefore, as per the policy of the State Govt. the EPF contribution has to be returned back by the member to the EPF Organization who in turn has to deposit the same to the Corporation where the employee was on deputation. Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2025.09.15 12:22:14 +0530 2 2. It has been informed that the petitioner has contacted the Corporation for allowing her to deposit the amount which has been refused. Hence, this petition. 3. According to the circular issued by the Govt. of Chhattisgarh, for pension contribution of the EPF participant has to be returned back to the EPF Organization. Therefore, it is directed that the petitioner shall submit the amount of EPF contribution to EPF Organization within three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and in turn the EPF Organization though it is not a party in the present case will see that the amount is transferred to the Corporation so that the grievances of the petitioner can be resolved by allowing her to take the benefit of family pension or any other retiral dues of her husband. 4. With these observations and directions the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Aadil