Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39136 (CHH)

VEERAN v. NANSAI (DELETED) THROUGH LRS.

MCC/822/2025 · 2025-08-12

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:40680 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 822 of 2025 • Veeran S/o Shri Nanku Rathore Aged About 98 Years R/o Village Sadhwani, Tahsil Pendraroad Distric - Gaurela- Pendra - Marwahi (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus 1. Nansai (Deleted) Through Lrs. Nil 1.1 - Smt. Terasia W/o Late Ram Singh Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Sadhwani, Nawapara P.S. Gaurela Tah. Pendra District- Gaurela Pendra Marwahi (C.G.) 1.2 - Pappu S/o Late Ram Singh Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Sadhwani, Nawapara P.S. Gaurela Tah. Pendra District- Gaurela Pendra Marwahi (C.G.) 1.3 - Kanak D/o Late Ram Singh Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Sadhwani, Nawapara P.S. Gaurela Tah. Pendra District- Gaurela Pendra Marwahi (C.G.) 2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Pendra Road District - Gaurela - Pendra Marwahi (C.G.) 3. The Sub Divisional Officer Pendra Road District - Gaurela - Pendra Marwahi (C.G.) 4. The Additional Collector Pendra Road District - Gaurela - Pendra Marwahi (C.G.) 5. Additional Commissioner Bilaspur Division Bilaspur District -Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. The Board Of Revenue Bilaspur Divisional Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For State : Mr, Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 13. 08.2025 1. The present application has been moved for restoration of WP227 No. 256 SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.08.13 14:16:33 +0530 2 of 2014 which was dismissed on 30.07.2025. 2. Learned counsel for applicant would submit that on account of some unavoidable circumstances, no one could appear before this Court when the matter was taken up for hearing, therefore, WP227 No. 256 of 2014 was dismissed for want of prosecution. He would submit that the applicant/petitioner is interested in pursuing the matter. He would pray to restore the appeal to its original number. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose. 4. Heard. 5. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Sinha, and grounds raised in the application, the present application is hereby allowed. The WP227 No. 256 of 2014 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1,000/- payable to the Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Committee, Bilaspur. 6. Accordingly, the instant MCC is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant