ALTAF KHAN S/O SHRI UMED KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8591/2024 · 2025-11-17
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39133 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39133 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8591/2024 Altaf Khan S/o Shri Umed Khan, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Near Adda, Idgaanh Waali, Near Masjid, Village Neemla, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Shri Navratan Sharma S/o Shri Chitra Mal Sharma, R/o Nagal Koju, Jaipur, Govindgarh, ( Jaipur Rural), Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan, India. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/11/2025
1. A prayer has been made to quash the proceedings of impugned FIR No. 121/2023 registered with Police Station Banipark, Jaipur (West) on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
2. This Court vide order dated 15.01.2025, directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of the contents of the compromise.
3. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Investigating Officer who has verified the factum of compromise arrived at between the parties.
4. Considering the contents of the compromise arrived at between the parties and applying the principles of law as laid
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-8591/2024] down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 & State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688, this Court deems it just and appropriate to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 BNSS.
5. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed. The proceedings of impugned FIR No.121/2023 registered with Police Station Banipark, Jaipur (West) for the offence under Sections 379, 420, 120-B of IPC and Section 66 of the IT Act against the petitioner stands quashed and set-aside.
6. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/121