Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:43660 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10259 of 2016 Applicant :- Anil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Yadav,Ashok Kumar Rai,Mangla Prasad Rai(Senior Adv.),Pavan Kumar Pandey,Santosh Kumar Upadhyay,Tulsi Singh Yadav,Vinod Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- Aditya Kumar Singh,Ashfaq Ahmed Ansari,G.A.,Rajeev Pandey Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and Sri Rajeev Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.2 as well as learned AGA. 2. The present application has been filed to quash the entire criminal proceedings of Case No.1279 of 2015 (State Vs. Anil and others) in connection with chargesheet dated 15.10.2015, arising out of Case Crime No.18-C of 2014, under Sections 467, 471, 420 IPC, P.S. Nanauta, District Saharanpur, pending in the court of learned Additional Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Deoband. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant submitted that compromise has already been preferred and the same has also been verified by learned court concerned on dated 19.07.2024 which has been appended with this petition, this fact has also been ascertained and seconded by learned counsel for respondent no.2. 4. The parties have amicably settled their dispute and fact of compromise has been confirmed and admitted by learned counsel for opposite parties and jointly submitted that there would be no harm and error and would be in the interest of justice that the proceedings may be quashed in light of the compromise. 5. A three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & another, (2012) 10 SCC 303, has observed in para 58 of the said judgment that where the High Court quashes a criminal proceeding having regard to the fact that the dispute between the offender and the victim has been settled although the offences are not compoundable, it does so as in its opinion, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is resorted; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. 6. In the case of Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandraojirao Angre, [(1988) 1 SCC 692], Hon'ble the Apex Court has also observed that where matters are also of civil nature i.e. matrimonial, family disputes, etc. the Court may consider "special facts", "special feature" and quash the criminal proceeding to encourage genuine settlement of disputes between the parties. 7. Keeping in mind the position of law and facts, circumstances of the case,entire proceedings of Case No.1279 of 2015 (State Vs. Anil and others) in connection with chargesheet dated 15.10.2015, arising out of Case Crime No.18-C of 2014, under Sections 467, 471, 420 IPC, P.S. Nanauta, District Saharanpur alongwith said chargesheet, is hereby quashed. 8. Accordingly, the present application stands allowed. 9. This order is being passed by this Court after hearing the contesting parties. If at all, respondent no.2 feels that he has been duped or betrayed, then in that event, he may file recall application explaining the reasons for filing the said application. 10. The parties may file the copy of this order before the court concerned within two weeks from today. Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Vivek Kr. Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad