[2025:RJ-JP:27103] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10899/2025 Mukesh S/o Raghuveer, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Pancholi, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Departmenta Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. District Collector And District Magistrate, Dausa, Dausa Collectorate, Somnath Nagar, Dausa, Rajasthan - 303303 3. Sub - Divisional Magistrate, Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan - 303508 4. Tehsildar, Sikrai, District Dausa Rajasthan - 303508 5. Patwari, Patwar Ghar Pancholi Village, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa - 303509 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.N. Sharma Mr. Shimbhu Dayal Poswal For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 21/07/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer. “i) By a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the Respondents may be directed to construct the overhead water tank in khasra no. 1188/628 as required by the order dated 29.01.2025 passed by the District Collector, Dausa; ii) By a suitable writ order or direction, in the nature, thereof, direct the Respondents neither to encroach upon the public way nor construct overhead water tank at a place other than [2025:RJ-JP:27103] (2 of 3) [CW-10899/2025] reserved for the same vide order dated 29.01.2025 of District Collector, Dausa. iii) Direct the Respondents to comply with the recommendation of the committee constituted by them and get the demarcation done with the help of the settlement department. iv) Direct the Respondents to protect the boundaries of the land of the Petitioner and not to disturb him from the peaceful use and occupation of his land in khasra no. 1088/1006; v) Any other order, which this Hon'ble Court deem just and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the Petitioner. vi) Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that before approaching this Court, the petitioner has already approached in the office of the respondents for redressal of his grievance but no heed has been paid, hence under such compelling circumstances, he approached this Court by way of filing this writ petition. 3. Considering the above submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to file one more representation before the respondents for redressal of his grievance. In case, any representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of one week from today, it is expected from the authorities to decide the same strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four weeks. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order or direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way, the [2025:RJ-JP:27103] (3 of 3) [CW-10899/2025] respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/40