SHRI SHRIPAD BHASKAR DABU v. KAMALAKAR SHRIPAD DHABU
SA/508/1995 · 2025-01-02
Gauri Godse
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39130 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39130 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
30-SA-508-1995.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 508 OF 1995 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4488 OF 1995 Shripad Bhaskar Dhabu … Appellant Vs. Kamalakar Shripad Dhabu and Ors. … Respondents None for the Appellant.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE :
2nd JANUARY 2025
ORDER :
1. None had appeared on 5th December 2024 for the appellant. By way of last chance two weeks time was granted to take steps against deceased respondent no.2. Office remark shows that steps are not taken till date. Hence, Second Appeal is dismissed as abated against respondent no. 2.
2. Respondent no. 2 is original defendant no.1. The second appeal arises out of a suit for partition and separate possession. Hence, in view of the dismissal of the second appeal as abated against respondent no. 2 who is the defendant, nothing further would survive in the second appeal as the second appeal would 1/2 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2025.01.03 11:07:51 +0200
30-SA-508-1995.docx stand abated as a whole. Hence,second appeal is dismissed as abated.
3. In view of the dismissal of the second appeal, pending civil application is disposed of as infructuous.
[GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2