Veerilli Bapiraju v. Bhogavilli Narasimham @ Narasimha Rao
SA/880/2004 · 2025-04-28
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3913 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3913 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010025262004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 880/2004
Between:
Veerilli Bapiraju and Others
...APPELLANT(S) AND
Bhogavilli Narasimham Narasimha Rao and Others
...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1.
M V SURESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following Judgment:
Sri M.V.Suresh, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the sole appellant died long ago and despite of best efforts, the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant are not coming forward to prosecute the appeal and therefore, necessary orders may be rendered in the Appeal.
2
2. In that view of the matter, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated by operation of law. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 28.04.2025 PSA
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 880 of 2004
Date: 28.04.2025 PSA