Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39127 (AP)

Jujjavarapu Srinivas v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/40415/2018 · 2025-02-17

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010839212018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Jujjavarapu Srinivas The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER This writ petition under Article filed for the following relief: “…..to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ orders of the 3rd respondent dated 08 CC0CC/1/2018-DT-2 wherein it was ordered for confiscation of the seized stock IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 40415/2018 ...PETITIONER AND The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) following: etition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: rit or order more particularly one in the nature andamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the respondent dated 08.10.2018 in file No. DSO 2(V3)-CSEG (vide Ref.No.V3/CS/382/2017 wherein it was ordered for confiscation of the seized stock IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) 226 of Constitution of India is rit or order more particularly one in the nature declaring the DSO- V3/CS/382/2017) wherein it was ordered for confiscation of the seized stock 2 BSB, J W.P.No.40415 of 2018 belongs to the petitioner under Section 6A(i) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, without application of mind and without considering the documents submitted by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently, set aside the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 08.10.2018 in file No DSO-CC0CC/1/2018-DT-2(V3)CSEG (vide Ref. No V3/CS/382/2017), and to pass such other order or orders….” 02. The learned Assistant Government Pleader reported that he has no written instructions. 03. Sri K.Yaswanth, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of interim order dated 20.11.2018 in I.A.No.01 of 2018 in this writ petition directing release of the seized stock of oil, no further order is required. 04. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated :17.02.2025 GRL 3 BSB, J W.P.No.40415 of 2018 85 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 40415 of 2018 Dated :17.02.2025 GRL 4 BSB, J W.P.No.40415 of 2018