Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39125 (CHH)

MANSHU GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2561/2025 · 2025-08-17

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:41344-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2561 of 2025 Manshu Gupta S/o Pramod Gupta Aged About 26 Years R/o Mannu Chowk Tikrapara P.S. City Kotwali Tehsil and District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through P.S.- City Kotwali, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Pratibha Mahant D/o Ramdayal Mahant Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Hardibajar District Korba Chhattisgarh Presently Residing At Near House of Savita Kalda Juna Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Akash Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Prashant Dansena, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 18.08.2025 1. Heard Mr. Akash Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.08.18 18:49:44 +0530 2 respondent No. 1/State and Mr. Prashant Dansena, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may allow the petition and also be pleased to quash the charge-sheet filed against them, arising out of the Crime No. 119 of 2025 registered at Police Station City Kotwali, District Bilaspur (C.G.), in the interest of justice.” 3. On perusal of the prayer made in the present petition, it is observed that the same is defective in nature. The prayer is vague and sketchy, as it does not even mention the offences under which the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. In these circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with appropriate prayer. 4. Learned State counsel and learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 2 have no objection to the said prayer. 5. Accordingly, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with proper prayer. Such liberty is granted subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit 3 a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost before the Registry of this Court and produce the receipt thereof at the time of filing the fresh petition, if any. The amount so deposited shall be transmitted to the Government Disable College, Mana Camp, Raipur (C.G.). 6. The certified copy of the charge-sheet and other documents, if any, be returned to the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan