DHARAM SINGH S/O SHRI MOOLCHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12300/2025 · 2025-10-14
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39116 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39116 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41852] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12300/2025 Dharam Singh S/o Shri Moolchand, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dulapura, P.s. Mahuwa, District Dausa (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena Mr. Kishan Lal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-Addl.GA cum PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 14/10/2025
1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 224/2025 registered at Police Station Raini, District Alwar wherein he has been charged for the offence punishable under Section 303 (2)of BNS, 2023.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged offecnce is triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submitted that seven other criminal cases of similar nature have been registered against the petitioner.
[2025:RJ-JP:41852] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12300/2025]
4. In rebuttal, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that out of the above seven cases, the petitioner has already been acquitted in three of the criminal cases. Counsel submits that the petitioner undertakes that he will not commit or repeat the offence in the future, therefore a condition be imposed in case, he is found involved in any criminal activity in future, a liberty be granted to the Jurisdictional Court to pass appropriate
order.
5. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record.
6. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate and also considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS.
7. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Dharam Singh S/o Shri Moolchand, arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
8. In case, the petitioner is found involved in committing and repeating the same offence again in the future, the Learned Public
[2025:RJ-JP:41852] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12300/2025] Prosecutor and State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail before the Jurisdictional Court.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/131