1 APHC010824972014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2029/2014 Between: 1. PATAN USMAN KHAN, NALGONDA DT.,, S/O. RAHAMATHULLA R/O. MIRYALGUDA TOWN, NALGONDA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP REP PP AND 2 OTRS, REPT. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTORM, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD. 2. PATAN TAHASEEN PARVEEJ, D/O. PATTAN JOHN BASHA, R/O. D.NO. 10-102, DURGA VILAS HOSTEL SANDU, OPP: AMUDALA FACTORY, AMARAVATHI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. PATAN IKRATHAASUM, D/O. PATTAN USMAN KHAN, AGED : 14 MONTHS, (2ND RESPONDENT BEING MINOR, REPESENTED BY HER NATURAL MOTHER) R/O. D.NO. 10-102, DURGA VILAS HOSTEL SANDU, OPP: AMUDALA FACTORY, AMARAVATHI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to i) allow the Crl.R.C. by setting aside the order dated 19-06-2014 passed in M.C.No.7 of 2013 on the file of the II Addl. J.M.F.C. Sattenpalli, Guntur district; ii) and to grant such other relief or 2 reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 2773 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing the certified copy of judgment in M.C.No. 7 of 2013 on the file of the II Addl. J.M.F.C. Sattenpalli, Guntur District. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMAKOTAIAH KANDALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. B CHINNAPA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This Court has called for the report from the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sattenapalli. He submitted report informing that he sent notices to the parties through Sub-Inspector of Police, Amaravathi Police Station. But it was reported that the petitioner is not residing at the address found in the record and he made enquiries with the local village elders and the V.R.O., Amaravathi Village and Mandal, who also confirmed that the petitioner is no longer residing in the same address and a written report from the V.R.O. was also obtained. Further, despite service of notice, the respondent did not appear before this Court. The report indicates that both parties are not showing interest. Despite best efforts made, notices could not be served. This criminal revision case is filed by the husband 3 questioning the order of maintenance. It seems that he is not showing interest. This Court has no other option except to dismiss this petition. 2. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dt: 25.07.2025 ARR 4 238 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2029/2014 Dated: 25.07.2025 ARR