Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39111 (HP)

Satish Kumar v. Dalip Kumar

CR.R/670/2025 · 2025-12-04

Rakesh Kainthla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 670 of 2025 Date of Decision: 04.12.2025 Satish Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Dalip Kumar ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr.Prikshit Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a receipt dated 04.12.2025, issued by the Member Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, regarding the deposit of ₹11,250/- which is 7.5% of the cheque amount of 1,50,000/-. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent under instructions submits that complainant does not want to proceed further with the complaint in view of the compromise effected between the parties. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 3. In view of this, the judgment passed by learned Sessions Judge, affirming the judgment and order passed by learned Trial Court are ordered to be set aside and the complaint is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Learned counsel for the parties submit that an amount of ₹40,000/- has been deposited before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solan, H.P. which is to be disbursed to the complainant as per compromise. Hence, the amount of ₹40,000/- lying deposited before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solan, H.P. is ordered to be disbursed to the complainant under proper identification and receipt by remitting the amount to the savings account of the complainant on furnishing of bank details. 5. The petitioner is stated to be in judicial custody and he is presently lodged in Sub Jail Solan District Solan H.P. He is ordered to be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. Release warrants be prepared accordingly and the same be sent to the Sub Jail Superintendent, Solan, District Solan, H.P. and learned Trial Court through FASTER forthwith for necessary compliance. 3 6. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 04th December, 2025 (ravinder) Digitally signed by RAVINDER KUMAR DN: C=IN, O=HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA, Phone=35ecb6f93c6891a7dae90f163e34d7ecaa420b13af1363204ab0e0f5c87077dc, PostalCode=171001, S=Himachal Pradesh, SERIALNUMBER=f6cc63c55495d14ce1f8623eacdb6cb9ef2c553803537a2f53c4ee637cbebaff, CN=RAVINDER KUMAR Reason: I am the author of this document Location: RAVINDER KUMAR Date: 2025-12-04 18:53:20