Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39107 (AP)

Vagdevi Educational Society v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/39515/2018 · 2025-07-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

PHC010820472018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA F^RADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT T>r^ HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA x WRIT PETITION NO: 39515 OF 2Q1« ■■ 1 ■/,lu a ij Between: Vagdevi Educational Society, Rep. by its Secretary and Correspondent, B.Sashivardhan Reddy, S/o Krishna Reddy, Aged about 28 Years, R/o. D.No.125-8A-16-4,Prashanthnager, Madanapalli, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary to Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, 2. The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madanapalli, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Madanapalli Circle, Madanapalli, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Station House Officer, Madanapalli Taluk Police Station, Madanapalli, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. Ch Ramesh, Circle Inspector of Police, Madanapalli Circle, Madanapalli, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. 7. Sunil Kumar, Station House Officer, Madanapalli Taluk Police Station Madanapalli, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. 8. Bodireddigari Rama Mohan Reddy, S/o Late B.Venkataramana Reddy, Aged about 49 Years, Occ Business, R/o. Mondiragimanupalle, Kosuvaripalle Village, Thamballapalle Mandal, Chittoor District. 9. Bodireddigari Gopal Reddy, S/o B.Venkatramana Reddy, Aged about 39 Years, Occ, Business, R/o. 145-11-5-1-A, 5th Cross Prasanth Nagar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 10.B Saradamma, W/o Venkata Siva Reddy, Aged about 65 Years, Occ, Business, R/o. 145-11-5-1-A, 5th Cross Prasanth Nagar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 11.B Vasudeva Reddy, S/o Venkataramana Reddy, Aged about 50 Years, Occ, Business,R/o. 145-11-5-1-A, 5th Cross Prasanth Nagar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 12. Bodireddigari Jaipal Reddy, S/o Venkatasiva Reddy, Aged about 35 Years, Occ, Business,R/o. 145-11-5-1-A, 5th Cross Prasanth Nagar,Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 13.B Saraswathamma, W/o Vasudeva Reddy, Aged about 44 Years, Occ, Business,R/o. 145-11-5-1-A, 5th Cross Prasanth Nagar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 14.Chitiki Gopal Reddy, S/o Venkata Reddy, Aged about 45 Years, Occ, Business, R/o. 16/620-10, Seshappa Thota, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 15. Bodireddigari Mallikarjuna Reddy, S/o Vasudeva Reddy, Aged about 24 Years, Occ,Business, R/o. Mutravaripalle Village, Kosuvaripalle Post, Thamballapalle Mandal, Chittoor District. 16/Ravindra Neela, S/o Reddappa, Aged about 42 Years, Occ, Business, R/o. Marpuri Stree, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the high handed action of the respondents 4 and 5 in interfering with the alleged civil disputes pending between the managing committee of the petitioner society and the respondents 8 to 16 and threatening the members of the petitioners society to vacate the college premises with a view to induct the respondents 8 to 16 and other persons to show they are in the possession of the college, without any authority of law is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take necessary action against the respondents 4 and 5 for their illegal acts of interfering into the^ civil disputes into the respondents 8 to 16 for their personal gains. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with the alleged civil disputes pending between the managing committee of the petitioner society and the respondents 8 to 16 by giving the police protection to the members of the petitioner society pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME (AP) / Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 8 to 16: SRI PRAKASH C The Court made the following order: APHC010820472018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) QMS [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 39515/2018 Between: 1.VAGDEVI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, B.SASHIVARDHAN REDDY, S/0 KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/0. D.N0.125-8A-16- 4,PRASHANTHNAGER, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MADANAPALLI CIRCLE, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MADANAPALLI TALUK POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. CH RAMESH, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MADANAPALLI CIRCLE, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. SUNIL KUMAR, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MADANAPALLI TALUK POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. BODIREDDIGARI RAMA MOHAN REDDY, S/O LATE B VENKATARAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/0. MONDIRAGIMANUPALLE, KOSUVARIPAI.LE VILLAGE, THAMBALLAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. BODIREDDIGARI GOPAL REDDY, S/O B.VENKATRAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS. R/0. 145-11-5-1-A, 5TH CROSS PRASANTH NAGAR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 10.B SARADAMMA, W/0 VENKATA SIVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC, BUSINESS, R/0. 145-11-5-1-A, 5TH CROSS PRASANTH NAGAR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 11.B Vy!\SUDEVA REDDY, S/0 VENKATARAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC, BUSINESS,R/0. 145-11-5-1-A, 5TH CROSS PRASANTH NAGAR., MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 12.BODiREDDIGARI JAIPAL REDDY, S/0 VENKATASIVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC, BUSINESS,R/0. 145-11-5-1-A, 5TH CROSS PRASANTH NAGAR,MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 13.B SAR/KSWATHAMMA, W/0 VASUDEVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC, BUSINESS,R/0. 145-11-5-1-A, 5TH CROSS PRASANTH NAGAR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 14.CHITIKI GOPAL REDDY, S/0 VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC, BUSINESS, R/0. 16/620-10, SESHAPPA THOTA, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 15.BODIREDDIGARI MALLIKARJLiNA REDDY, S/0 VASUDEVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCC,BUSINESS, R/0. MUTRAVARIPALLE VILLAGE, KOSUVARIPALLE POST, THAMBALLAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 16.RAVINDRA NEELA, S/0 REDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC, BUSINESS, R/0. MARPURI STREE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (AP) 2.PRAKASH C The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the respondents 4 and 5 in interfering with the alleged civil disputes pending between the managing committee of the petitioner society and the respondents 8 to 16 and threatening the members of the petitioners society to vacate the college premises with a view to induct the respondents 8 to 16 and other persons to show they are in the possession of the college, without any authority of law is illegal, 3 arbitrary and unconstitutional respondents 2 and 3 to take and consequently direct the necessary action against the 1 ^ interfering into the civil disputes into the respondents 8 to 16 for their persona! gains." 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the Police disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos. For ready reference, the written instructions are not interfering in the civil 8 to 16. 3. are extracted hereunder: submitted that all the contentions of the petitioner in the are not correct, except the facts admitted herein it is submitted ditnnfe P^W/oner in the affidavit, there is a management dispute of civil nature between the petitioner and the respondents % tr^ 1 a educational BagT on tie tSSrixisi Ss~~s|~Ss; 4. Sri Koti Reddy Idamakanti, learned submit that the court counsel for the Petitioner would may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Poiice are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel thereto. miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARl ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTlI^ OFFICER closed. stand //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The PrI. Secretary to Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, 2. The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madanapalli, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Madanapalli Circle, Madanapalli, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Station House Officer, Madanapalli Taluk Police Station, Madanapalli, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. One CC to Sri. Koti Reddy Idamakanti Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri. Prakash C Advocate [OPUC] 8. TwoCCsto GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 9. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:17/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 39515 OF 2018 I I n SEF M2S ^ . Currem seciion ggSPATCWeS-^ o’ m •k.y^* DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS L