1 2025:CGHC:39733 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9321 of 2025 1 - Smt. Neelu Sharma W/o Shatish Sharma Aged About 56 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Girls Govt. Higher Secondary School Khokhra, District - Janjgir - Chmapa (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur. District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur. District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur. District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat , Atal Nagar, Naya, Raipur. District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Janjgir - Champa District - Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 6 - Zila Panchayat District Janjgir Champa Through Its Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Janjgir - Champa District - Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 7 - Zila Panchayat Bilaspur Through Its Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bilaspur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ujjwal Choubey, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.08.08 15:19:43 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 08/08/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction towards the respondent/authorities for grant of Kramonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the order passed by Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 on 28.02.2024 and also as per circular dated 10.03.2017. issued by the State Government of Chhattisgarh. 2. The claim of the petitioner is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others” in W.A. No. 261 of 2023 has also consider the identical issue. The petitioner is also entitle for Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No. 261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 3 5. Against the order passed in WA No. 261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Supreme Court bearing SLP (C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated 17.03.2025. 6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No. 261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of petitioner on its own merits. 7. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved