Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39099 (BOM)

PANDURANG RAVAJI RAUT ( DECD.) SHRIKANT P. RAUT (SINCE DECD. THRO. HIS L. Rs. ) USHA SHRIKANT RAUT v. PUNDALIK SHAMRAO RAUT

SA/469/2008 · 2025-06-25

Shri Madhav J Jamdar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

79-SA-469-2008.doc Arjun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.469 OF 2008 Pandurang Ravaji Raut, …Appellants Since Deceased Through his LRs. 1/1 Late Shrikant Pandurang Raut, [Deceased Through LRs.] 1/A. Usha Shrikant Raut & Ors. Versus Pundalik Shamrao Raut & Ors. …Respondents _______________________________________________________________ Mr. Bhushan Walimbe a/w Mayank Tripathi, for the Appellants. Mr. Shantanu Patil, for Respondent Nos.1 & 3. Mr. Shubham Dhenge, for Respondent No.2a. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 25 JUNE 2025 P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Walimbe, learned Counsel for the Appellants, Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 3 and Mr. Dhenge, learned Counsel for Respondent No.2a. 2. All the learned Counsels state that parties have settled the dispute and accordingly tender the ‘Consent Terms’. 3. The Consent Terms are signed by Appellant No.3d for himself and as Constituted Attorney of other Appellants. The Consent Terms are signed by Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2. The respective Power of Attorneys are also annexed to the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are also signed by respective Advocates of the parties. All the executants 1 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2025.06.26 22:13:23 +0530 79-SA-469-2008.doc to the Consent Terms are present in Court and state that the dispute between the parties has been settled in terms of the Consent Terms. 4. Accordingly, the Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The Consent Terms read as under :- 2 79-SA-469-2008.doc 3 79-SA-469-2008.doc 4 79-SA-469-2008.doc 5 79-SA-469-2008.doc 6 79-SA-469-2008.doc 7 79-SA-469-2008.doc 8 79-SA-469-2008.doc 9 79-SA-469-2008.doc 10 79-SA-469-2008.doc 11 79-SA-469-2008.doc 12 79-SA-469-2008.doc 13 79-SA-469-2008.doc 14 79-SA-469-2008.doc 15 79-SA-469-2008.doc 16 79-SA-469-2008.doc 17 79-SA-469-2008.doc 18 79-SA-469-2008.doc 5. The undertakings given in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to this Court. 6. Accordingly, Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] 19