Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39097 (BOM)

BABAN @ CHANDRAKANT VITTHAL JADHAV AND ORS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/2065/2025 · 2025-04-22

Shri S M Modak, Shri Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 08-WP-2065-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2065 OF 2025 Baban @ Chandrakant Vitthal Jadhav & Ors. .... Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents ….... • Mr. Umesh H. Pawar a/w Mr. Sagar R. Sonawane, Advocate for Petitioners. • Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 22nd APRIL, 2025 P.C. : 1. After arguing for some time, when we expressed our disinclination to grant relief in this case, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for unconditional withdrawal of this Petition with liberty to prefer an application for discharge before the Trial Court as the learned APP informed the Court that the charge-sheet is already filed. 2. Permission is granted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally. The Petitioners are at liberty to prefer an application for discharge before the Trial Court. Nesarikar MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date: 2025.04.25 17:08:12 +0530 2 / 2 08-WP-2065-25.odt 3. If such an application is preferred, it shall be decided on its own merits, in accordance with law, without being influenced by withdrawal of this Petition. 4. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. (S. M. MODAK J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)