Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39096 (RAJ)

RAJKUMAR JAT @ KALU S/O ROHITASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12529/2025 · 2025-10-03

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40234] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12529/2025 Rajkumar Jat @ Kalu S/o Rohitash, R/o Rathodowali Dhani Bahram Ka Bas, Police Station Bansur District Kotputli-Behrod (Raj.) (Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputali). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sweta Soni for Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/10/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Rajkumar Jat @ Kalu S/o Rohitash seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.229/2025 dated 03.08.2025 registered at P.S. Bansur, District Kotputali-Behrod, for the offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 331(6) & 324(4) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant, has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. She further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant-accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. She also submits that the [2025:RJ-JP:40234] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12529/2025] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for applicant-accused submitted that due to animosity present petitioner was named during investigation but in the report which was registered against unnamed persons present petitioner was not named by complainant. She further submitted that injured Sheesh Ram has also sustained simple injuries and there is no evidence to commit mischief by present petitioner, who is in custody since 04.09.2025, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant-accused. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On basis of report dated 03.08.2025 lodged by complainant Ajit Kumar Jat against 4-5 unknown persons about mischief and deadly assaulted upon his father, a criminal case is registered and matter is investigated. During investigation, present petitioner-accused was named and he has been arrested on 04.09.2025 and since then he is in custody. The injured report of Sheesh Ram suggested that he sustained simple injuries. There is no criminal antecedent against petitioner accused. 7. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, the Court finds that the grounds raised in support of [2025:RJ-JP:40234] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12529/2025] the bail application, coupled with other facts such as absence of any apprehension regarding absconding of applicant- accused, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, it is justified to grant of bail. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Rajkumar Jat @ Kalu S/o Rohitash, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail with condition that the applicant would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J ANAND TANWAR /79