Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39096 (PAT)

Shatrudhan Roy v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./29543/2025 · 2025-05-12

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29543 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2024 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani ====================================================== Shatrudhan Roy S/o Late Khushi Lal Roy R/o Village- Ladaniya, P.S.- Andramath, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 33 liters illicit liquor was recovered from the house of petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way connected with the aforesaid recovery. Petitioner has been made accused only on suspicion. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that 33 liters illicit liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner. He Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29543 of 2025(2) dt.12-05-2025 2/2 further submits that petitioner is not entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.). 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T