Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39091 (KAR)

SRI R P DEEPU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/31788/2025 · 2025-10-25

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42211 WP No. 31788 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 31788 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI R P DEEPU S/O. PUTTALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT. RUDRAKSHIPURA, SOMANAHALLI POST, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571433. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M N SATHYA RAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER AND THAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571428. 3. FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, MANDYA SUB-DIVISION, MANDYA DISTRICT-571401 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571401. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42211 WP No. 31788 of 2025 5. THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, NO. 203, 2ND FLOOR, INFORMATION SOUDHA, 'D' DEVARAJ URS ROAD, OPP. TO VIKASA SOUDHA WEST GATE-02, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SIDDARTH BABURAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI.G.B.SHARATH GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO COMPLY THE ORDER OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED.10.11.2023 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-C AND FURNISH THE NECESSARY INFORMATION TO THE PETITIONER AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PAY THE COSTS OF THIS PETITION AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS THAT THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42211 WP No. 31788 of 2025 2. The petitioner is before this court seeking for the following relief: "To issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to comply the order of the 5th respondent dated.10.11.2023 produced as Annexure-C and furnish the necessary information to the petitioner and direct the respondents to pay the costs of this petition and grant such other reliefs that this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant under the circumstances, in the interest of justice." 3. The short grievance of the petitioner is that the information directed to be furnished by the respondent No.2 as per the order passed by respondent No.5, State Information Commission vide Order dated 10.11.2023 at Annexure-C has still not been complied. 4. When an order has been passed by the State Information Commission to furnish certain information, it was but, required for the concerned authorities to comply with the same within a reasonable period of time, not exceeding 60 days - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42211 WP No. 31788 of 2025 from the date of the said order. The same not having been done, I pass the following order: ORDER a) The writ petition is allowed. b) A mandamus is issued directing the respondent No.2 to comply with the order of respondent No.5 dated 10.11.2023 at Annexure-C within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30