Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39090 (RAJ)

POONAM D/O RAMESHWAR LAL W/O ARVIND KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/10896/2025 · 2025-08-18

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32105] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10896/2025 Poonam D/o Rameshwar Lal W/o Arvind Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village And Post Manota Khurd, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu Working on the Post of Nursing Officer Under Transfer At PHC Kankariya (Khetri) District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director (Non Gazetted) and Additional Director (Administration), Panchayati Raj (Medical) Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Chief Medical and Health Officer, Jhunjhunu. 4. Medical Officer Incharge, PHC Kankariya (Khetri) District Jhunjhunu. 5. Sanjaypal, Presently Working on the post of Nursing Officer in PHC Kankariya (Khetri) District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 18/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that his client wants to withdraw this present writ petition with liberty to file a detailed representation narrating his grievances in the office of respondent No.2. 2. Considering the facts above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. [2025:RJ-JP:32105] (2 of 2) [CW-10896/2025] 3. In view of the submissions made in the present writ petition, the Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation submitted by the Petitioner within a period of four weeks from today by a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide such representation has been issued only with a view to ensure an expeditious redressal of the Petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 5. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-5