( 2025:JHHC:34234 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7528 of 2025 Virendra @ Virender, son of Daan Masih, aged 27 years, residence of 118, Santokh Majra (49), P.O.- Santokh Majra, P.S.- Santokh Majra, Kaithak, District- Kaithal-136004, Haryana. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jyoti Ramya Thakur, wife of Chandra Moleshwar Thakur, resident of Apartment No. 302, Rameshwar Apartment, South Office Para, Doanda, P.S.- Doranda, District- Ranchi. …. Opp. Parties WITH B. A. No. 6268 of 2025 Farhadur Rahman @ Tanjim, aged about 42 years, son of Late Abu Sayed Mian, resident of Medortari @ Madatori, P.O.- Medortari @ Madartari, P.S.- Fakirganj, South Salmara, District- Dhubri (Assam). …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jyoti Ramya Thakur, wife of Chandra Moleshwar Thakur, resident of Apartment No. 302, Rameshwar Apartment, South Office Para, Doranda, P.S.- Doranda, District- Ranchi. …. Opp. Parties WITH B. A. No. 6404 of 2025 Ravi Shankar Dwivedi @ Ravi @ Ravi Shankar Dewedi @ Raju, aged about 35 years, son of Navratna Diwedi, resident of House No. 46, Gali No. 2, Shyam Vihar, Block-E Extension, P.O. & P.S.- Chhawla, New Delhi, permanent resident of Village- Gara-Khurd, P.O.- Sundipur, P.S.- Kandi, District- Garhwa (Jharkhand). …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party ------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Shyam Narsaria, Advocate Mr. L.C.N. Shahedeo, Advocate Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P. Ms. Shweta Singh, A.P.P. ----- 4/ 17.11.2025 All these bail applications arise out of the same police case. Accordingly, these cases are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Heard the parties. 2. 3. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Ranchi Sadar Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024 corresponding to Cyber Case No. 19 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and sections 66(B), 66(C) and 66(D) of the I.T. Act, pending in the court of learned Addl. Judicial Commissioner-II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Ranchi. 4. Bail applications of petitioners Virendra @ Virender and Ravi Shankar Dwivedi @ Ravi @ Ravi Shankar Dewedi @ Raju were earlier rejected by this Court vide B.A. No. 9218 of 2024 and 8499 of 2024 respectively, while bail application of petitioner Farhadur Rahman @ Tanjim was earlier dismissed as withdrawn vide B.A. No. 8455 of 2024. 5. Petitioners had enticed the informant in depositing amount of Rs.29,94,050/- in various schemes on the pretext that she will get higher returns from the said deposits. During the course of investigation, it transpired that in the accounts of petitioners Virendra @ Virender and Ravi Shankar Dwivedi @ Ravi @ Ravi Shankar Dewedi @ Raju, money was transferred. However, no money was transferred in the account of petitioner Farhadur Rahman @ Tanjim. 6. It was submitted that the petitioners are in custody since June, 2024. 7. A report regarding the stage of trial, earlier called for, has been received. It appears that though charge has been framed in this case, but the prosecution has not examined any witness. 8. Considering the period of custody and the fact that the trial is not likely to be concluded in near future, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Judicial Commissioner-II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Ranchi, in connection with Ranchi Sadar Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024 corresponding to Cyber Case No. 19 of 2024. (Ambuj Nath, J.) R.Kr. 17.11.2025