Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39089 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA KUMAR YADAV SON OF SHRI RAMDHAN YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1266/2025 · 2025-05-02

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18661] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1266/2025 Rajendra Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Ramdhan Yadav, Resident Of Ahiron Ki Dhani, Shyampur Paldi, Tehsil Viratnagar, District Jaipur. At Present Kotputli, Behror, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Sugal Ram Gurjar Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Gurjar, Resident Of Ward No. 09, Dhani Gujran Near Bhomiya Ji Temple, Village Pando, Tehsil Viratnagar, District Jaipur, At Present Kotputli- Behror. 3. Vikram Singh Gurjar Son Of Shri Ramchandra Gurjar, Resident Of Ward No. 09, Dhani Gujran Near Bhomiya Ji Temple, Village Pando, Tehsil Viratnagar, District Jaipur, At Present Kotputli- Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP Mr. Abhinav Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/05/2025 mDr izdj.k eqdnek ua- 21@2016 ,oa mlds vk/kkj ij izLrqr vfHk;ksx i= ;kphx.k fo#) varxZr /kkjk 324] 426 ,oa 308 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dks jn~n djus gsrq izLrqr dh xbZ gSA izdj.k esa ;kph ds vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 341] 323] 379] 307 vkbZihlh esa iathc) dh xbZ FkhA rnqijkar iqfyl }kjk ;kph ds fo#) Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 324] 426 ,oa 308 ds varxZr vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa vkgr lqxy jke xqtZj o ifjoknh ,oa vkgr fodze flag xqtZj ds e/; ijLij ;kph ls le>kSrk gks x;k gS vkSj bl lanHkZ esa izn'kZ 2 le>kSrk U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa le>kSrs ds vk/kkj ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k [2025:RJ-JP:18661] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1266/2025] 110@2016 rFkk mlls mn~Hkwr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh ftlds }kjk ;kph ds fo#) lacaf/kr U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gS mls lekIr fd;k tk,A v;kph la[;k 2 o 3 dh vksj ls vf/koDrk Jh vfHkuo xqIrk mifLFkr gSa vkSj v;kph la[;k 2 ls 3 O;fDr'k% U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gSaA v;kph la[;k 2 o 3 }kjk ;g rF; Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS fd muds }kjk ;kph jktsUnz dqekj ;kno ls fnukad 03-02-2025 dks jkthukek dj fy;k x;k gS vkSj mDr jkthukes ij muds gLrk{kj gSaA v;kph la[;k 2 o 3 dk ;g Hkh dguk gS fd ;kph ds fo#) mDr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh lekIr dh tkrh gS rks mUgsa fdlh Hkh izdkj dh vkifRr ugha gSA cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa izFker% fjiksVZ Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 341] 323] 379] 307 esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA mRrjksRrj iqfyl }kjk ;kph ds fo#) Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 324] 426 ,oa 308 ds varxZr jkthukek izLrqr fd;k x;k vkSj bl lanHkZ esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk vknsf'kdk fnukad 18-02-2025 ds ek/;e ls mDr jkthukek bl vk/kkj ij vLohdkj fd;k x;k fd mDr vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 320 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa Neuh; ugha gSA izdj.k esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; ijLij jkthukek gksus ds rF; fufoZokn gSA vkjksfir vijk/k dh izd`fr dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, vkSj i{kdkjksa ds e/; ijLij gq, le>kSrs dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr n`"Vkar Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, eSa izdj.k esa ;kph jktsUnz dqekj ;kno ds fo#) iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ,oa mlls mn~Hkwr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh ftlds }kjk ;kph ds fo#) lacaf/kr U;k;ky; esa vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS dks lekIr djuk mfpr le>rk gwaA mijksDrkuqlkj mDr ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR)J RAMESHWAR PRASHAD /73