Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39087 (RAJ)

SHYAMSUNDER S/O SHRI KISHORILAL v. GAYATRI DEVI W/O SHRI CHIMANLAL

CR/296/2025 · 2025-10-07

Uma Shanker Vyas

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40534] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 296/2025 Shyamsunder S/o Shri Kishorilal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Bardod, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror Presently Resident At President Apartment Sector-10, Plot No. 18, Dwarka, New Delhi. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Vikas Rustagi S/o Shri Dharampal Rustagi Age About 54 Years, Resident Of Luharo Ka Mohalla, Bardod, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.). ----Defendant-Petitioner Versus 1. Gayatri Devi W/o Shri Chimanlal, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of Mohalla Chokdayat, Bardod, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 2. Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Chimanlal, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Mohalla Chokdayat, Bardod, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) ----Plaintiffs-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 07/10/2025 ;kph&izfroknh dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ,oa U;kf;d eftLVªsV] cgjksM+] ftyk dksViwryh&cgjksM+ }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k&117@2024 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 16-07-2025 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls ;kph&izfroknh dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&izfroknh dh cgl lquh] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA [2025:RJ-JP:40534] (2 of 2) [CR-296/2025] oknhx.k dk ;g okn jgk gS fd oknh i{k }kjk fnukad 13-01-1974 dks oknxzLr tk;nkn 15]000@&:i;s esa ekSf[kd :i ls [kjhn dj dCtk izkIr fd;k x;k FkkA ;kph&izfroknh dh ;g vkifRr jgh gS fd cspkudrkZ dk uke izdV ugha fd;k gS rFkk izfroknh ds nRrd firk ftlls ;g laifRr [kjhnuk crk;k gS] fnukad 02-12-1973 dks gh e`R;q gks xbZ Fkh] okn fe;kn ckgj gS] vfHkdFku izFken`"V;k gh vln~Hkkfod gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mBkbZ xbZ vkifRr;ksa dks rF;ksa o fof/k dk fefJr iz'u ekurs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k ds ek/;e ls ;kph&izfroknh dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k gS] ftlesa dksbZ voS/kkfudrk ;k vfu;ferrk ugha gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vidyarthi and Ors. (2024) 11 SCC 503 o Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamal Kumar Sen & Ors. (2018) 5 SCC 644 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; ek= oknh ds vfHkdFkuksa o okni= ds lkFk izLrqr nLrkostksa ij gh fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gSA okn esa of.kZr rF;ksa o vfHkdFkuksa ls lqlaxr izfroknh dk cpko vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gSA laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 16-07-2025 dh iqf"V djrs gq, ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA LFkxu vkosnu o vU; vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /02