1 2025:CGHC:40613 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9402 of 2025 1 - Balram Prasad Sahu S/o Late Madan Lal Sahu Aged About 55 Years Occupation - Service, Working As Netra Chikitsa Sahayak Adhikari (Opthomological Assistant Officer), Community Health Center, Katghora, District - Korba (C.G.), R/o Ward No.- 08, Jailroad, Katghora, District - Korba (C.G.), ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Health And Family Wel- fare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Health Services, State Of Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Cum District Magistrate Korba, District - Korba (C.G.) 4 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer Korba, District - Korba (C.G.) 5 - The Block Medical Officer Block - Katghora, District - Korba (C.G.) 6 - The Block Medical Officer Block - Pali, District - Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate. For State : Shri Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 12.08. 202 5 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 30.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Katghora to Korbi. 2 2. After arguing for sometimes, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, there is a provision under clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05-06- 2025 for making a representation before the transfer committee. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move representation before the said transfer committee and the said transfer committee may be directed to decide the representation, so filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law within the stipulated time frame. 3. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel and would submit that he has no objection, if such a direction is to be given to the transfer committee to decide the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within the stipulated time frame. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make a representation before the transfer committee as provided under clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05-06-2025. If such representation is made to the said committee, the same shall be decided in accordance with law on its own merits within a further period of one month from the date of receipt of representation along with copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation/liberty the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder