Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010020482025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/647/2025 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. HAVING ITS CORPORATE AND REGISTERED OFFICE AT E-8, EPIP, RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPURA, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA, PIN-302022 AND ONE OF THE BRANCH OFFICE AT B.R. ARCADE, 3RD FLOOR, OPPOSITE TO PRIYA PALACE HOTEL, 21, JANAPATH, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI-781007, KAMPUR. VERSUS RAJIB DAS AND ORS S/O. SRI BANAMALI DAS, R/O. VILL.- SAGARGHAT, P/O. AND P/S. DHARAMTUL. DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782412. 2:UTTAM HAZARIKA S/O. SUREN HAZARIKA R/O. VILL.- TELAHI BHAKATGAON P/O. AND P/S. DHARAMTUL DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782412. 3:BABAMALI DAS S/O. LT. CINARAM DAS R/O. VILL.- SAGARGHAT TELAHI BHAKATGAON P/O. AHATGURI P/S. DHARAMTUL DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782412. 4:HARDEP SINGH S/O. MALKIT SINGH Page No.# 2/3 R/O. A. T. ROAD KHUTIKOTIA DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782002. 5:CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. STAR CITY COMPLEX 5TH FLOOR M.S.S. PATH LACHITNAGAR GUWAHATI DIAT. KAMRUP 9M) ASSAM PIN-781007. 6:MRIDUL BORAH S/O. S. BORAH R/O. VILL.- NO. 1 GHARPHALIAGAON P/O. CHENIJAN DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782105. 7:THE HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ADTYAM BUIDING 5TH FLOOR M.S.S PATH LACHITNAGAR GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781007 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S. PEGU, M CHETIA,MR. A J SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : MS. P BORTHAKUR (R-7), MS. M BHUYAN(R1),MS. P BORAH(R1),MR. M ALAM(R1),MR. R GOSWAMI(R-7),MS. M SAIKIA(R-7) Linked Case : RP(FAM.CT.)/0/0 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ULUBARI VERSUS Page No.# 3/3 RAJIB DAS AND ORS MORIGAON ------------ Advocate for : Shantanu pegu Advocate for : appearing for RAJIB DAS AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 07.09.2026 Heard Mr. A J Saikia, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. K Boruah, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 as well as Ms.P Borthakur, the learned counsel Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent No.7. 2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of 63 days of delay in preferring the connected Miscellaneous Appeal. 3. I have found that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Moreover, Mr. Boruah and Ms. Borthakur have submitted that they have no objection, if the delay is condoned. 4. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned. 5. The connected MAC Appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. 6. The name of Mr.K Boruah shall be shown in the Cause List as the counsel representing the respondent No.1 in the connected Appeal. 7. The IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant