Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39078 (AP)

Soma Venkateswarlu, v. Mekala Kotaiah,

SA/397/2002 · 2025-01-31

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010814892002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 397/2002 Between: Soma Venkateswarlu, ...APPELLANT AND Mekala Kotaiah ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. J VENUGOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. S RAJ KUMAR The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/defendant under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 15.10.2001 passed in A.S.No.14 of 2000 on the file of learned III Additional District Judge’s Court, Guntur, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 29.11.1999 passed in O.S.No.330 of 1993 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Guntur. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of either side. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date:31.01.2025 MS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.397 OF 2002 Date:31.01.2025 MS