Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39077 (KAR)

SRI PILLAPPA v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WA/943/2025 · 2025-10-17

D K Singh, Rajesh Rai K

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41661-DB WA No. 943 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT APPEAL NO. 943 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI PILLAPPA S/O LATE DODDA VENKATA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/A MYLASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SURESH KUMAR K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU 560002 3. THE TAHASILDAR, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE 4. REVENUE INSPECTOR, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41661-DB WA No. 943 of 2025 BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK 5. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK 6. THE CHAIRMAN, KPTCL, K.R. CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 28.04.2025 PASSED IN WP No-32162/2013 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) This Writ Appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 28.04.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.32162/2013. 2. The petitioner's claim was that his predecessor-in- interest was granted land in question by the Government on - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41661-DB WA No. 943 of 2025 30.08.1940. However, the Government had taken the stand that there was no such grant in favour of petitioner's predecessor-in-interest. The petitioner had already filed a Civil Suit in O.S.No.549/2008 seeking a declaration that he has become the owner of the land in question by way of adverse possession. 3. We find no error in the impugned judgment and order and therefore, there is no merit in this appeal and the same is dismissed. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. SD/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22