[2025:JHHC:38537] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7408 of 2025 1. X 2. X-1 3. Ropna Oraon, aged about 34 years, S/o Budheshwar Oraon, R/o Tangrabasli, P.O. and P.S.- Argora, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Chiranjeev Bhadoria, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 22.12.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Mandar P.S. Case No. 189 of 2021, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 448, 341, 323, 354 (A), 354 (B), 379, 504, 506 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No. 1 is the uncle of the informant, petitioner No. 2 is the cousin brother of the informant and petitioner No. 3 is the cousin sister of the informant. He next submits that there is land dispute between the parties with regard to a land under Mauza Tangar basil, having Khata No. 05, Plot No. 312, admeasuring an area of 50 decimals. He further submits that both the sides belong to schedule tribes community and according to which, married girls have no right over the property of mother and father, which is being claimed by the informant and in view of that false allegation has been made against the petitioners. He then submits that in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused has [2025:JHHC:38537] -2- already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 4856 of 2025. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the allegation is said to be of 19.11.2021 and the case has been registered on the next date i.e. 20.11.2021. It has been pointed out that the petitioners happened to be the relatives of the informant, as noted hereinabove, and further the dispute is with regard to a land and in that view of the matter, the petitioners, named above, are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks after X-mas Holidays and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-22.12.2025 Amitesh/-