Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39074 (PNJ)

J.K. BAJAJ & ORS. v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

CWP/15821/2005 · 2025-05-03

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 884 Dr. Jatinder Kumar Bajaj State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: None Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition is for setting 15.07.2005 and all consequential orders/action in implementing the same resulting in placing 40 junior doctors over and above the petitioners, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 2. D in case lis still subsists. 03.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15821 Date of decision: 03.05.2025 Dr. Jatinder Kumar Bajaj and others Versus Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioners. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition is for setting 15.07.2005 and all consequential orders/action in implementing the same resulting in placing 40 junior doctors over and above the petitioners, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Disposed of reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived still subsists. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15821-2005 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.05.2025 ..Petitioners ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for setting aside order dated 15.07.2005 and all consequential orders/action in implementing the same resulting in placing 40 junior doctors over and above the petitioners, might not isposed of reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No aside order dated 15.07.2005 and all consequential orders/action in implementing the same resulting in placing 40 junior doctors over and above the petitioners, might not isposed of reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.03 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document