APHC010817902018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI «[i] I' FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT OO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO; 2992 OF 2ni« Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the orders in CrI.MP N 578 of 2015 in F.C.O.P. M.C.No.65 of 2015, dt.12-09-2018 on the file of the Family -Cum-VIII Additional District Ongole. Judge, Prakasam at Between: Shaik Nayab Rasool, S/o Khajavali Aged about 37 Chakicherla village, Ulavapadu Mandal years, Occ. Employee R/o Prakasam District. ...Petitioner I Respondent AND 1. Shaik Rajiya Sultana, W/o Nayab Rasool, Aged about 35yrs, 2. Sk Jarina Jani, D/o Nayab Rasool, Aged about 18yrs, 3. Sk Kareena Jani, D/o Nayab Rasool, Aged about 18yrs, (All are resident of D.No.42-1-194-167 Kakatiya Nagar, Turpu Palem Ongole) ... Respondents/Petitioners 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor at Amaravathi High Court ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders in orders in CrI.MP No. 578 of 2015 in F.C.O.P. M.C.No.65 of 2015, dt. 12-09-2018 on the file of the Family -Cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Prakasam at Ongole. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SRI RIZWAN ALI SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent No.4: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following order: APHC010817902018 m IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRiDAY.THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2992/2018 Between: 1.SHAIK NAYAB RASOOL, S/0 KHAJAVALI AGED ABOUT 37YRS, OCC. EMPLOYEE R/0 CHAKICHERLA VILLAGE, ULAVAPADU MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1 .SHAIK RAJIYA SULTANA, W/0 NAYAB RASOOL AGED ABOUT 35YRS RESIDENT OF D.NO.42-1-194-167 KAKATIYA NAGAR, TURPU PALEM, ONGOLE 2.SK JARINA JAN I, D/0 NAYAB RASOOL AGED ABOUT 18YRS RESIDENT OF D.NO.42-1-194-167 KAKATIYA NAGAR, TURPU PALEM, ONGOLE 3.SK KAREENA JAN I, D/0 NAYAB RASOOL AGED ABOUT 18YRS RESIDENT OF D.NO.42-1-194-167 KAKATIYA NAGAR, TURPU PALEM, ONGOLE 4.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. I ...RESPONDENT{S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the orders in CrI.MP N 578 of 2015 in F.C.O.P. M.C.No.65 of 2015, dt.12-09-2018 on the file of the Family -Cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Prakasam at Ongole the present Criminal Revision is filed on the following lANO: 1 OF 2018 i in T. circumstances stated the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ^ suspend the orders in orders in CrI.MP No. 578 of Ll5 in FC O P M C Mo jLgJ%aVas;rat°iL -Cum-VI 11 Additional District jus^ce’. ^ in the interest of Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PNAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.RIZWAN All SHAIK 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the F.C.O.P.No.65 of 2015 petitioner submits that the main case i.e., was disposed of wde judgment dated 10.03.2024. 2. In view of the disposal of the mai mam case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 3. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case iIS dismissed as infructuous. As^^e^uel, Miscellaneous petitions if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAIWESH BABU deputy registrar 11 /VC-—^ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1- The Family -Cum-Vlll (with records) otcc.! AdvocatefOPUC, 4 The Se r n fOPUCJ Section Officer, Criminal Section Amaravathi. 5- Two CD Copies Additional District Judge, Prakasam at Ongole. High Court of Andhra Pradesh at PR sree \ HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER CRLRC NO. 2992 OF 2018 I 2 5 SEP 2025 ^ . Current :>eciion m DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS