Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29058-DB CCC No. 944 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 944 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
SRI. K. NANJUNDAPPA S/O LATE KARIBASSAPPA AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS R/AT CHIKKATHOTLUKERE SRI ADVI SWAMY MUTT ASHRAM KORA HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT-572 101 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI VIJAY KASHYAP S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
GOWRAV KUMAR SHETTY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER APPELLATE AUTHORITY OF DISTRICT COLLECTORS AND MANAGEMENT TRIBUNAL TUMKURU DISTRICT 572 101
2.
SIDDESH M.
THE TAHSILDAR Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29058-DB CCC No. 944 of 2024 SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICERS OFFICE TUMKURU TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572 101
3.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU. …ACCUSED (BY SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ACCUSED FOR WILLFULLY DISOBEYING THE ORDERS OF THE HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.8890/2024(GM-RES) DATED 05.06.2024 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29058-DB CCC No. 944 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) This contempt proceeding is initiated for wilful disobedience of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in WP.No.8890/2024 dated 05.06.2025, whereby the respondents are directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner-complainant at Annexure-A.
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate files a compliance affidavit along with documents and submits that the representation of the complainant has been considered.
3. In that view of the matter, the contempt petition does not survive for further consideration. However, the complainant if aggrieved by the compliance, is at liberty to challenge the same. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE CR/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68