IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 2413 of 2025 Date of Decision: 03.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Usha Raghav …….Petitioner Versus The Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): By way of instant Execution Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents to implement/ execute the order/judgment dated 05.09.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No. 12997 of 2025, titled Usha Raghav vs. Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank and others, whereby direction came to be issued to the respondents to ensure that necessary action upon the request of the petitioner for grant of family pension in terms of Regulations 31 of Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank(Officers and Employees) Service Regulation, 2010, is taken expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Since needful never came to be done at the behest of the respondents within stipulated time, petitioner approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Before notice, if any, could be issued in the instant proceedings, Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. He placed on record email dated 02.12.2025, wherein it has been stated that agenda was approved by the Board, hence the family pension will be paid according to HPGB Pension Regulation 2018 to the petitioner in the month of December, 25 along with payable arrears. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that family pension otherwise approved by the Board is paid to the petitioner on or before 31st December, 2025 alongwith arrears, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 03,2025 (shankar)