(2025:JHHC:30686) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8435 of 2025 1. Ektarul Shekh @ Ektarul Sk. Aged about 28 years, son of Najrul Shekh @ Najrul Sk. 2. Tarikul Shekh @ Tarikul Sk., aged about 26 years, Son of Najrul Shekh @ Najrul Sk. 3.Ekramul Haque @ Sk., aged about 44 years, Son of Late Reju Shekh @ Late Reju Sk., All resident of Village-Chanchki, P.O.-Prithinagar, P.S.-Pakur (M), Dist.- Pakur, Jharkhand (816107) 4.Jaynal Shekh @ Jainal Sk., aged about 44 years, son of Sedul Shekh, 5.Modasher Shekh @ Moda Shekh @ Modasher Sk. @ Moda @ Modaser Sk. Aged about 32 years, son of Saidul Shekh 6.Tamijuddin Shekh @ Tami @ Tamijuddin @ Tami Sk., aged about 37 years, Son of Saidul Shekh 7. Manarul Shekh @ Mana Shekh, aged about 36 years, son of Shaukaat Ali, All resident of village-Jankinagar, P.O.-Prithinagar, PS.-Pakur (M), Dist.- Pakur, Jharkhand (816107). …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party ------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sumit Gautam, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P. ----- 2/ 26.09.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 78 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 323, 325, 307, 302, 447, 452, 427, 504 and 120B/34 of the I.P.C, pending in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he will not pressing the prayer of bail of the petitioner No.6 namely, Tamijuddin Shekh @ Tami @ Tamijuddin @ Tami Sk. 4. So far as the prayer for bail of the petitioner No.6 is concerned, it is dismissed as not pressed. 5. On 18.04.2024 between 9:00 to 10:00 am, petitioners alongwith co- accused persons entered into the house of the informant and assaulted him and his family members, due to which, his son Habibur Sk succumbed to his injuries. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against them. It was further submitted that in the case diary, the witnesses have specifically stated that co-accused Tamijuddin Sk had inflicted rod blow on the person of the deceased. It was lastly submitted that the similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court in B.A. Nos.6493 of 2024 and 10170 of 2024 respectively vide order dated 01.10.2024 and 07.12.2024. 7. In view of the submission made above, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur, in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 78 of 2024. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Rohit/-