Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39061 (CHH)

ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, URMAAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4538/2025 · 2025-08-24

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:42860 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4538 of 2025 1 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Urmaal Registration No. 1609, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) Through Samiti Manager Dinesh Khare, S/o - Tularam Khare, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Urmaal, Dist.- Gariyaband (C.G.) 2 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Kandokela, Registration No. 1643, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) Through Samiti Manager Ganesh Singh Thakur, S/o - Jagmohan Singh Thakur, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Amlipadar, Tehsil- Amlipadar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 3 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Dhorsh, Registration No. 1611, Branch - Gohrapadar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) Through Samiti Manager Tankdhar Sahu, S/o- Amru Ram Sahu, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Shetalkhuti, Tehsil - Amlipadar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 4 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Paktiya, Registration No. 1611, Branch - Khadma, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) Through Samiti Manager Lalit Dhruv, S/o- Vishambahr Dhruv, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Paktiya, P.S. And Tehsil - Chura, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Parsuli, Registration No. 1765, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) Through Samiti Manager Devanand, S/o- Bahur Singh Dhruv, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Sadak Parsuli, P.S. - Gariyaband, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Dhawalpur, Registration No. 1660, Branch - Gariyaband, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) Through Samiti Manager Gajendra Kumar, S/o- Sukhram Chakradhari, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Dhawalpur, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 7 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Raniparteva, Registration No. 1515, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) Through Samiti Manager Kuleshwar Sahni, S/o- Shankarlal Sahni, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Khadma, Tehsil - Chura, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 8 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Akalvara, Registration No. 50, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) Through Samiti Manager Puranik Nishad, S/o Thanuram Nishad, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Ranipartela, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 2 9 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Sohagpur, Registration No. 62, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) Through Samiti Manager - Gunaram Dhruv, S/o Bahur Singh Dhruv, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Sadakparsuli, Tehsil And District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 10 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Piparchedi Kala, Registration No. 52, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) Through Samiti Manager Dilip Singh, S/o Udho Singh Netam, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Korgaon, Tehsil And District - Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Regd. Address - 6th Floor Tower- C, Commercial Complex Cbd Sector 21 Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur, C.G. 3 - District Marketing Officer, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation Ltd. (C.G.), Gariyaband, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 4 - Assistant Commissioner Cooperative Societies, Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - Nodal Officer, Zila Sahakri Kendriya Bank Maryadit, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pragati Pandey on behalf of Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent/State For Respondent No. 2 & 3 : : Mrs. Upasna Mehta, Dy. G.A. Mr. Rakesh Jha, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 25/08/2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and 3, on instructions, contends that a verification was done in presence of the Managers of the petitioners/societies and no shortage was found in the societies. He further contends that there is no need to recover any amount from the petitioners/societies. 2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners/societies 3 submits that she wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in future if any cause of action arises/survives. 3. The instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima